HUNDRED ACRE DAGGER Shirt

Category

Trending

Design

Original artwork, copyright protected

Printing

Printed to order and shipped from the USA

Processing

2–3 business days after your order is placed.

Delivery

5–10 business days within the US, 7–15 business days internationally.

Cost

Calculated at checkout from your address and the number of items.

Tracking

A tracking number is emailed as soon as your order ships.

Read the full shipping policy

Now it’s entirely possible that the HUNDRED ACRE DAGGER Shirt and I will buy this trucks were left exactly where they should have been, and Glacier is just using the driver’s lack of communication as a wedge to gain standing, but nothing in this decision says that companies can sue striking unions for lost product or wages. The issue is cement doesn’t spoil until you load into a truck. Plenty of unions know how to stagger their there actions. This Union is local and has had a very acrimonious history with the industry and also was at least partially successfully circumvented via scabs. The decision to load concrete and mix it with a strike pending was very boneheaded and has now made some bad law. also the actions of the union where completely intentional and caused real damage. they should definitely be able to sue Yeah. People should really read the first page of the ruling at least. I’m definitely pro union, but based on the law, and what happened, I don’t think this sets any precedent anyone should be worried about. The Union ordered a work stoppage DURING a shift in which a bunch of concrete had been mixed and was ready to pour. The company had to waste all of the concrete for that day. The law this ruled on, the National Labor Relations Act, allows workers to strike, it doesn’t allow them to purposely damage property while doing so. They ruled the NLRA prempted the state law in Washington where they originally found in favor of the union. In my layman’s opinion, this seems to only be a blow to unions IF the union plans on engaging in work stoppages that PURPOSEFULLY damage the property of the company they are striking against, which also seems to have been brought before the courts multiple times. So it likely doesn’t change that much. It’s also part of the NLRA that you can’t do this.

HUNDRED ACRE DAGGER Shirt, hoodie, tank top, sweater and long sleeve t-shirt

This passed 8 to 1, with justice Ketanji Brown Jackson being the HUNDRED ACRE DAGGER Shirt and I will buy this sole dissent. Her dissent mostly focuses on the fact that the National Labor Relations Board, formed by the NLRA, should be handing out judgment, not the Supreme Court. There is a current complaint with the NLRB that has not been decided yet, so she felt the court should just let that play out. I don’t think she’s wrong, but this made it to the court first, and it seems like the NLRA has language surrounding the ability to determine rulings in Federal Court, so that’s what the concrete company did. Thomas, Gorsuch, and Alito signed a concurring opinion to the majority that gets into the weeds on the Garmon Doctrine of the NLRA and whether states should have more rights or whatever, I don’t know, fuck those guys, I’ll let someone smarter than me get into the weeds on that. Regardless, their concurring opinion does not create precedent. It could potentially be brought up in arguments later, but it doesn’t mean anything as of now. The majority opinion is just that the NLRA trumps state law, and that the Union fucked up by purposely damaging company property during their organized strike.

1. Length is measured from the highest point on the collar down to the bottom hem. 2. Width is measured across the body of the shirt under the armpits, one way. 3. Sleeves are measured from center back to hem.